A recent ruling upheld the Bowlin family’s claim regarding a fence that served as a property boundary since 1967. This decision followed a dispute over the removal of the fence and trees by neighboring property owners. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed damages of $12,000 due to intentional tree removal and ordered the reconstruction of the fence. A recent ruling upheld the Bowlin family’s claim regarding a fence that served as a property boundary since 1967. This decision followed a dispute over the removal of the fence and trees by neighboring property owners. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed damages of $12,000 due to intentional tree removal and ordered the reconstruction of the fence.
Trending
- Group of 42 ex-judges defends SIR, slams opposition attack on Election Commission
- Bryan Cranston rebuilt $2.5m bungalow as net-zero home, sold it for $5.45m
- Proof of 21 ‘compromised transfers’, 11 policy changes part of CBI’s Punjab file
- New crocodile species found in rocks used to build Egypt’s Great Sphinx
- Will those whose earnings have stopped love me: PM Modi amid SIR row
- Starlink entry row: Is Ambani the real boss of India, asks Elon Musk
- GST Council scraps tax officers’ arrest powers, eases refund rules
- Nana Patekar death: Goa Police register ‘unnatural death’ case
Arkansas family wins $12,000 after neighbours removed old fence and trees
By
Add A Comment