A recent ruling upheld the Bowlin family’s claim regarding a fence that served as a property boundary since 1967. This decision followed a dispute over the removal of the fence and trees by neighboring property owners. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed damages of $12,000 due to intentional tree removal and ordered the reconstruction of the fence. A recent ruling upheld the Bowlin family’s claim regarding a fence that served as a property boundary since 1967. This decision followed a dispute over the removal of the fence and trees by neighboring property owners. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed damages of $12,000 due to intentional tree removal and ordered the reconstruction of the fence.
Trending
- Jammu & Kashmir: Landmine found along LoC in Poonch, destroyed
- Jammu and Kashmir: High court orders passport revival for student purusing MBBS in Iran
- Arkansas family wins $12,000 after neighbours removed old fence and trees
- Bypoll election results 2026: Date, time and where to watch vote counting
- US sanctions Indian firms, individuals as Iran oil crackdown widens
- America has enjoyed the greatest free lunch in history: Vivek Wadhwa reacts to Green Card crackdown on 8 IT companies, says they aren’t the visa abusers
- US executive admits $193.6m fraud after FBI finds 298 gold bars
- US suspends Microsoft from Green Card programme, here is what the company has to say