The assessment threw up two separate issues. The first concerned jewellery worth Rs 67,39,949 that the woman had disclosed in Schedule AL of her income tax return. The tribunal also examined whether the Rs 12 lakh paid to the HUF represented a genuine brokerage expense when the same person, the HUF’s Karta/coparcener, had already received another Rs 12 lakh for the same transaction. The assessment threw up two separate issues. The first concerned jewellery worth Rs 67,39,949 that the woman had disclosed in Schedule AL of her income tax return. The tribunal also examined whether the Rs 12 lakh paid to the HUF represented a genuine brokerage expense when the same person, the HUF’s Karta/coparcener, had already received another Rs 12 lakh for the same transaction.
Trending
- Only 15% going to work use public transport: NSO
- In a record, over 10,000 women clear JEE-Advanced
- Pahalgam handler rallies LeT support via anti-Israel rhetoric
- Elvis Presley raised $65,000 for USS Arizona Memorial before it opened in 1962
- Legislative privilege vs free speech: Supreme Court 7-judge bench may close case
- World entering age of flux, India will rise to challenges: EAM S Jaishankar
- Supreme Court may get 3 judges today, to be one short of full strength
- Form 6 not modified, only declaration added: Election Commission