A High Court judge ruled that specific assets of the deceased were legitimate gifts received by Masudur Rahman before death, dating back to October 2020. This ruling ignited legal contention with four co-defendants. The court detailed the asset scope, allowing appeals on particular grounds. Rahman secured costs due to his successful claim, but his plea for an enhanced costs budget was ultimately denied by the judge.
Trending
- Agniveers get 2-year extension, higher pay: Key changes under revised Agnipath scheme explained
- CBI successfully extradites sexual assault accused from UAE after Interpol Red Notice
- ‘Normalise, recognise and formalise’: Nadda accuses Congress of opposing SIR to legitimise outsiders, destabilise country
- From Iran to India: How Trump’s midterm loss could affect America’s foreign policy
- H-1B, immigration and Trump: Why Indian-American voters are reconsidering Republicans
- SC rejects woman’s plea to terminate six-month pregnancy over marital discord
- Diwali rush, GRAP curbs bring Delhi to a crawl: Long jams leave commuters fuming
- WPL schedule announced: Vadodara, Mumbai to host 5th edition; RCB vs MI in opener