At the heart of the case was whether Trump could use emergency powers under a national-security law to impose broad tariffs on imports. The Supreme Court ruled that the statute did not authorise such sweeping action. It held that tariffs are essentially a form of taxation, and under the Constitution, the power to impose taxes rests with Congress. At the heart of the case was whether Trump could use emergency powers under a national-security law to impose broad tariffs on imports. The Supreme Court ruled that the statute did not authorise such sweeping action. It held that tariffs are essentially a form of taxation, and under the Constitution, the power to impose taxes rests with Congress.
Trending
- PM Modi, Brazil President Lula sign rare earths deal; aim for trade beyond $20 bn
- Recurrent miscarriages: A medical expert gives a perspective
- Jeff Bezos’s ex-wife’s record $7.2 bn donation in 2025 called ‘Bad donation’, Musk agrees
- UAE launches pioneering gene therapy to treat autism and rare brain disorders in children
- Nottingham woman surpasses Elon Musk to become an ‘accidental quadrillionaire’ on paper
- Ram Charan and Upasana Konidela join Allu Arjun’s pre-wedding bash
- Pakistan vs New Zealand Super 8s: Venue stats, head-to-head, weather forecast
- Anthropic’s new tool wipes down billions from CrowdStrike, Cloudflare & other stocks