A building collapse in Satya Niketan killed seven people and injured several others. Rent agreements containing disclaimer clauses do not absolve PG owners of liability. Legal experts state that such clauses cannot permit conduct violating legal duties. Families of victims can still seek compensation if negligence and causation are proven. Investigations will determine the ultimate responsibility of owners and authorities involved. A building collapse in Satya Niketan killed seven people and injured several others. Rent agreements containing disclaimer clauses do not absolve PG owners of liability. Legal experts state that such clauses cannot permit conduct violating legal duties. Families of victims can still seek compensation if negligence and causation are proven. Investigations will determine the ultimate responsibility of owners and authorities involved.
Trending
- ‘Could kill us all’: Another AI employee quits, sounds alarm over safety
- SC seeks UP govt response on plea challenging MLAs, MLCs’ pension, perks
- China confirms Xi Jinping’s India visit for Brics summit on September 12-13, first trip in 7 years
- AI, quantum navigation & drone swarms: China’s J-50 aims to ‘leapfrog’ fighter technology
- ‘Be our co-traveller in space research’: PM Modi to France, other nations at space summit address
- Private 17.83-acre Georgia island hits market for $2.5 million
- Hawaii’s 9-foot invasive grass can produce 9,000 seeds per plant and fuel fires
- Trump goes desi: First voter ID, now cash in the account
Satya Niketan building collapse: Can a ‘no-responsibility’ clause shield a PG owner?
By
Add A Comment