The dispute arose from matrimonial proceedings between two highly qualified medical professionals. The wife, a practicing gynaecologist with an M.D. degree, challenged a trial court order which had partly rejected her application for maintenance under Sections 24 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The dispute arose from matrimonial proceedings between two highly qualified medical professionals. The wife, a practicing gynaecologist with an M.D. degree, challenged a trial court order which had partly rejected her application for maintenance under Sections 24 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Trending
- Quote of the day by Socrates: “Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people”
- T20 success not enough for ‘respect’: Manjrekar sets challenge for Sooryavanshi
- Evening news wrap: Bengal CM Mamata refuses to resign, Raghav Chadha meets President Murmu & more
- Battery fire: IndiGo Hyderabad -Chandigarh flight passengers evacuated by slides at destination; all safe
- Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong in layoff email to employees: I have watched engineers use AI tools
- Carlsen suffers first classical chess loss since table-slam outburst vs Gukesh
- ‘SIR’prising victory: Struck off electoral rolls, Farakka candidate ends Congress’s losing drought in West Bengal
- Mamata Banerjee refuses to resign, rejects poll defeat – what happens now?
