The ruling had significant consequences for the children of a family. They ultimately lost their claim over 3.5 acres of ancestral land and were left with only 50 cents. The ruling had significant consequences for the children of a family. They ultimately lost their claim over 3.5 acres of ancestral land and were left with only 50 cents.
Trending
- Essex siblings ordered to pay £209,000 after cutting down neighbours’ 33-foot Leylandii trees
- J&K BJP bigwig meets Shah day after Omar moves statehood resolution with autonomy reference
- Bangladeshi woman says Bengaluru hospital withheld husband’s body for 8 days over Rs 35L bill; High Commission intervenes
- Wangchuk apologises for comparing Ladakh situation with Tibet
- ‘It’s for perpetrator of terrorism to mend its ways’: Jaishankar takes aim at Pakistan in UN speech
- ‘Damage control’ after EC row: Congress demands SIR rollback, CEC’s resignation
- ‘India calls for restraint’: Jaishankar on ship attacks in Gulf, seafarers at UNGA – top quotes
- Artists’ $95K bid to save Nina Simone home ends with $850K restoration
