He was a tenant in Mumbai in a housing society that was slated to undergo redevelopment. He received two flats in the redeveloped building in return for surrendering his tenancy rights. The tribunal ruled that a tax demand under Section 56(2)(x) could not be imposed on the individual merely because he received two flats in exchange for giving up his tenancy rights in the redevelopment project. He was a tenant in Mumbai in a housing society that was slated to undergo redevelopment. He received two flats in the redeveloped building in return for surrendering his tenancy rights. The tribunal ruled that a tax demand under Section 56(2)(x) could not be imposed on the individual merely because he received two flats in exchange for giving up his tenancy rights in the redevelopment project.
Trending
- 1950 Washington bridge gets $114M overhaul, with new span floated in over 56 hours
- In 2021, researchers began placing concrete-block oyster reefs on Prince Edward Island; biomass rose 45-fold
- Ramaiah Group expands its educational legacy with the inauguration of RISM, foundation laying of Nareyana Pragnalaya
- A kidney wait since 2024 ends with an Army airlift and a rare double transplant
- Widow gets job after husband’s death; Rajasthan HC orders 25% salary to mother-in-law
- Google Brain founder does not agree that AI is coming to kill humans
- Quote of the day by Meg Ryan
- ‘This is treason’: Rahul Gandhi revives ‘vote chori’ charge after report of rift within EC
