A recent ruling by the Florida Supreme Court clarified that attorney-fees clauses do not automatically apply to future property owners. The case originated with an easement agreement involving Crown Castle South LLC and RJ’s International Trading LLC. Although RJ’s secured damages for trespass, it sought attorney fees based on the original agreement. The court determined that the legal-fees clause lacked connection to the use or enjoyment of the land. A recent ruling by the Florida Supreme Court clarified that attorney-fees clauses do not automatically apply to future property owners. The case originated with an easement agreement involving Crown Castle South LLC and RJ’s International Trading LLC. Although RJ’s secured damages for trespass, it sought attorney fees based on the original agreement. The court determined that the legal-fees clause lacked connection to the use or enjoyment of the land.
Trending
- What was Susie Wiles’ Camp David plot to save her White House job: Turn all blame on Pete Hegseth; Dramatic account of Trump yelling emerges
- ‘Keeping Sanjay in check could have prevented damage’: Sonia Gandhi on Emergency
- ‘She wanted a traditional ceremony’: DMK leader responds to criticism over Vedic rituals at granddaughter’s wedding
- Why can’t Congress break free from Gandhi family? Sonia responds to nepotism charge
- Hands-on inspection: Railway minister Ashwini Vaishnaw buys tea via UPI, interacts with passengers at Anand Vihar Station
- Divers find 1944 shipwreck 400 feet deep off Maine coast after 82 years
- UK bride brings wedding dress to hospital for dance with ailing father
- West Bengal SIR: Fourth retired judge resigns from appeals tribunals, cites ‘personal reasons’