A consumer commission ordered a retailer to refund expired noodles and pay compensation. The minor daughter fell ill after consuming the product, which had passed its expiry date. The commission rejected the seller’s ‘buyer beware’ defense, emphasizing seller responsibility. It ruled the retailer solely liable for failing to remove old stock. The family received a refund, compensation, and litigation costs. A consumer commission ordered a retailer to refund expired noodles and pay compensation. The minor daughter fell ill after consuming the product, which had passed its expiry date. The commission rejected the seller’s ‘buyer beware’ defense, emphasizing seller responsibility. It ruled the retailer solely liable for failing to remove old stock. The family received a refund, compensation, and litigation costs.
Trending
- ‘Our family has been shattered’: Ketan Agarwal’s father writes to President Murmu
- 48-hour miracle: How Delhi just did something it hasn’t done in 3 years
- India notifies rules for UK FTA vehicle import benefits ahead of July 15 rollout
- Madras High Court refuses to halt ‘Idhayam Murali’ release in Sudha Kongara plea
- Why butter is yellow while milk is white: The science behind it
- Humanoid robots perform live surgery for the first time in world-first medical breakthrough
- ‘Definitely handball’: Morocco coach questions Mbappé goal as VAR no-show sparks debate
- Gold price prediction: Will gold price see a bullish movement? Check today’s outlook