Candace Owens has reignited debate over the killing of Charlie Kirk after reports claimed the bullet recovered from his body did not match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. She criticized those who supported the case against Robinson, calling the evidence “non existent.” While investigators cite alleged confessions, the new forensic detail has raised fresh questions and intensified public scrutiny around the trial. Candace Owens has reignited debate over the killing of Charlie Kirk after reports claimed the bullet recovered from his body did not match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. She criticized those who supported the case against Robinson, calling the evidence “non existent.” While investigators cite alleged confessions, the new forensic detail has raised fresh questions and intensified public scrutiny around the trial.
Trending
- Where the Road Meets the River: Pedalling 375km to Sigandur
- Did Karoline Leavitt order to take down her ‘double-chin photo’? Here’s what happened
- From location to logistics: Challenges to Donald Trump’s Kharg Island ‘seize’ threat
- NBC apologises on air after showing wrong Tiger Woods crash footage during live coverage
- Identity on trial: Why India’s new transgender law is facing backlash
- ‘Demography plot’: TMC’s Abhishek Banerjee accuses BJP of ‘importing’ voters into Bengal
- Tamil Nadu polls: Stalin kicks off campaign with emotional pitch, targets AIADMK-BJP
- ‘No plan B, C or D’: FIFA asserts Iran will play World Cup in US