Tenants aren’t always responsible for repainting or minor repairs upon moving out. A Delhi High Court ruling clarified that landlords must distinguish between normal wear and tear, which they cover, and actual damage caused by tenants. While routine painting is the landlord’s duty, significant damage like removed fittings can be charged to the tenant, provided the landlord proves it and apportions costs fairly. Tenants aren’t always responsible for repainting or minor repairs upon moving out. A Delhi High Court ruling clarified that landlords must distinguish between normal wear and tear, which they cover, and actual damage caused by tenants. While routine painting is the landlord’s duty, significant damage like removed fittings can be charged to the tenant, provided the landlord proves it and apportions costs fairly.
Trending
- With fewer Gulf flights, how AI Express used aircraft downtime to speed up fleet retrofit
- The monkey puzzle tree: Chile’s ancient national tree that can live for 2,000 years
- ‘How is BJP democratically elected?’ Congress calls it ‘stolen election’ after 27 lakh voters deleted
- Hardik Pandya trade: CSK enter the race; seven franchises express interest
- Delhi Government approves two new heritage schemes under ‘Our Monuments, Our Pride’, private companies to ‘adopt’ monuments
- Paws over property: Delhi High Court says pets are family, returns dogs to adoptive owners
- No wedding rituals, no valid Hindu marriage despite registration: Gujarat HC
- US cracks down on ‘birth tourism’, warns of visa fraud, money laundering charges: What it means
