A Delhi high court ruling clarifies that families cannot claim compensation from a car owner’s personal accident insurance via the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) if the borrower dies driving the vehicle. Such claims, particularly under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act requiring proof of negligence, are deemed contractual and fall outside MACT’s jurisdiction, necessitating pursuit in consumer forums or civil courts. A Delhi high court ruling clarifies that families cannot claim compensation from a car owner’s personal accident insurance via the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) if the borrower dies driving the vehicle. Such claims, particularly under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act requiring proof of negligence, are deemed contractual and fall outside MACT’s jurisdiction, necessitating pursuit in consumer forums or civil courts.
Trending
- Apple no so ‘fruitful’ for Himachal? Climate pressures hill state’s Rs 5,000 cr economy
- After building a tech empire, Mark Zuckerberg is feeding his cows beer and macadamia nuts, and the goal is to create world’s highest-quality beef
- America’s richest families in 2026 ranked: Walmart heirs lead with $520 billion fortune
- ‘It absolutely stinks’: Football world erupts over Trump’s role in FIFA’s Balogun U-turn
- High court seeks Centre’s reply on Delhi Gymkhana Club eviction pleas
- Sonam Wangchuk’s ‘still alive’ post draws attention as hunger strike enters Day 9
- 10 coldest countries in the world 2026: Russia, Canada, Iceland and more
- ‘Bhang isn’t covered under NDPS’: Why Jharkhand HC overturned 11kg ‘ganja’ conviction