The dispute arose from matrimonial proceedings between two highly qualified medical professionals. The wife, a practicing gynaecologist with an M.D. degree, challenged a trial court order which had partly rejected her application for maintenance under Sections 24 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The dispute arose from matrimonial proceedings between two highly qualified medical professionals. The wife, a practicing gynaecologist with an M.D. degree, challenged a trial court order which had partly rejected her application for maintenance under Sections 24 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Trending
- ‘I own you, Brownie’: Ex-JPMorgan banker Chirayu Rana brings ‘threesome’ allegation against Lorna Hajdini
- Meenu Batra is still not in the clear: Attorney says fight to get Green Card or military parole not over
- Tamil Nadu CM swearing-in: Short of majority by just 10 seats TVK chief Vijay to take oath on May 7 – but how will it form government?
- ‘Won’t be tolerated’: Starmer warns Iran as UK probes foreign influence amid rising antisemitic attacks
- Quote of the day by Socrates: “Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people”
- T20 success not enough for ‘respect’: Manjrekar sets challenge for Sooryavanshi
- Evening news wrap: Bengal CM Mamata refuses to resign, Raghav Chadha meets President Murmu & more
- Battery fire: IndiGo Hyderabad -Chandigarh flight passengers evacuated by slides at destination; all safe