The Supreme Court intervened in a Chandigarh law officer recruitment dispute where a question on judicial review immunity led to differing High Court judgments. The court acknowledged the complexity, stating both answers could be considered correct from a law graduate’s perspective, deeming it unreasonable to expect a single definitive response from candidates. The Supreme Court intervened in a Chandigarh law officer recruitment dispute where a question on judicial review immunity led to differing High Court judgments. The court acknowledged the complexity, stating both answers could be considered correct from a law graduate’s perspective, deeming it unreasonable to expect a single definitive response from candidates.
Trending
- Turkey eyes multiple nuclear deals, in talks with South Korea, Canada, China, Russia
- ‘Loved us, married Modiji’: Kharge’s punchline on Deve Gowda remark leaves PM in splits – watch
- ‘Freedom of speech cannot be absolute’: Vaishnaw on Nora Fatehi’s ‘Sarke Chunariya’ ban
- ‘Kind people’: Iran thanks India as it receives first medical aid shipment from New Delhi
- Jag Laadki arrives in Gujarat: Third Indian vessel carrying crude oil reaches from Strait of Hormuz
- Kuldeep touches Jadeja, Rivaba’s feet: Viral wedding moment melts hearts – Watch
- Elon Musk makes ‘fun of’ Nvidia after GTC 2026 conference
- Assam MP Pradyut Bordoloi joins BJP; CM hints at recommending him for polls