Candace Owens has reignited debate over the killing of Charlie Kirk after reports claimed the bullet recovered from his body did not match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. She criticized those who supported the case against Robinson, calling the evidence “non existent.” While investigators cite alleged confessions, the new forensic detail has raised fresh questions and intensified public scrutiny around the trial. Candace Owens has reignited debate over the killing of Charlie Kirk after reports claimed the bullet recovered from his body did not match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. She criticized those who supported the case against Robinson, calling the evidence “non existent.” While investigators cite alleged confessions, the new forensic detail has raised fresh questions and intensified public scrutiny around the trial.
Trending
- Sexual violence used as weapon of war in Sudan, aid group says
- Know no one here, need help with visa: Indian Uber Eats driver jailed for raping customer in Lincolnshire
- Vidya Bharati maps NEP push, scales up ‘India-centric’ education network
- Syrian President meets Starmer on first UK visit after years of strain; migration, border security on agenda
- UK King Charles to tour US from April 27-30th for 1st time as Monarch
- IPL: Priyansh Arya not in XI as Punjab Kings bowl first against Gujarat Titans
- ‘Let him be at peace’: Himanta attacks Cong over Zubeen’s mention in manifesto
- ‘India managed Middle East situation well, but opposition wants to spread anarchy’: PM Modi