A Virginia appeals court has rejected a couple’s claim for additional compensation over an I-495 highway expansion, ruling that they could seek damages only for the temporary easement taken from their property, not losses linked to the wider road project. Their expert had estimated that the project could reduce the property’s value by nearly $500,000. A Virginia appeals court has rejected a couple’s claim for additional compensation over an I-495 highway expansion, ruling that they could seek damages only for the temporary easement taken from their property, not losses linked to the wider road project. Their expert had estimated that the project could reduce the property’s value by nearly $500,000.
Trending
- ‘Don’t assume you can swallow Kashmir with such attacks’: Farooq Abdullah targets Pak
- Virginia couple’s $500,000 highway loss claim rejected after $29,700 payout
- Community raises $50,000 for Canadian hockey player, 15, battling rare cancer
- Shannen Doherty’s estate gets half equity in $1.5M Texas home settlement
- Made-in-India 5G Radio Moves Closer To Market, Bulk Supplies Expected In 2027
- Govt mulls special session to pass women’s quota amendment bill: Report
- People free to protest against Congress: Priyanka Gandhi on police action against Kerala protesters
- ‘Sad day for democracy’: Bombay HC warns against criminalising constitutional right to protest