A High Court judge ruled that specific assets of the deceased were legitimate gifts received by Masudur Rahman before death, dating back to October 2020. This ruling ignited legal contention with four co-defendants. The court detailed the asset scope, allowing appeals on particular grounds. Rahman secured costs due to his successful claim, but his plea for an enhanced costs budget was ultimately denied by the judge.
Trending
- British govt unveils new rules for obtaining permanent settlement
- Purple 1888 Victorian house in LA listed for $2M
- Sonam Wangchuk’s wife told to stop classes in Leh school
- 77% of US voters fear AI election manipulation: Why deepfakes are raising alarm ahead of midterms
- Khaled Hosseini’s foundation educated Afghan students and built shelters for displaced families
- Scientist builds mini universe of 24k atoms to show time can be measured without a clock
- Trump hails Republican gains in Guam, links them to US midterms hopes
- ‘You remember neither promises nor skullcap’: NCP MP Aga Ruhullah quits, takes aim at Omar Abdullah