A Canadian online publisher suffered significant losses when Meta permanently removed its Facebook pages in 2020. The publisher, which had millions of followers, argued that this removal violated its business rights. Despite submitting numerous advertisements, many faced rejection for policy violations, which included misleading content. A court upheld Meta’s decision, emphasizing its protection under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. A Canadian online publisher suffered significant losses when Meta permanently removed its Facebook pages in 2020. The publisher, which had millions of followers, argued that this removal violated its business rights. Despite submitting numerous advertisements, many faced rejection for policy violations, which included misleading content. A court upheld Meta’s decision, emphasizing its protection under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
Trending
- Given 5% chance of walking again, Irish man takes on 3,000-mile US trek
- California real estate CEO sentenced to 18 months over $2.2m investor losses
- ‘Politicisation of energy flows harmful’: Jaishankar calls for diversified supply chains at G20
- Joely Fisher’s home sells for $2.9m three days after two-day estate sale
- Court rejects Nevada ranchers’ demand to swiftly remove excess wild horses
- US woman uses lottery winnings to fund neighbours’ first holiday abroad
- Three falcons died in neighbour row; $500k case may reach Supreme Court
- Publisher with 25m Facebook followers loses key claim over Meta’s 2020 shutdown