The Chhattisgarh high court dismissed petitions from Bangladeshi refugees seeking protection from eviction. The court stated foreigners cannot claim rights over government land without legal entitlement. Petitioners argued they had lived on the land for over sixty years. However, the court cited Supreme Court decisions on unauthorized occupation. The ruling emphasized that prolonged possession does not grant legal rights over government property. The Chhattisgarh high court dismissed petitions from Bangladeshi refugees seeking protection from eviction. The court stated foreigners cannot claim rights over government land without legal entitlement. Petitioners argued they had lived on the land for over sixty years. However, the court cited Supreme Court decisions on unauthorized occupation. The ruling emphasized that prolonged possession does not grant legal rights over government property.
Trending
- ‘Do not befriend Kaafirs’: Pakistani general levels terror allegations against India
- Why are our cities digging the same roads again and again?
- Kerala rain fury: 15 dead, 7 missing as relief camps shelter thousands
- How J. Robert Oppenheimer brought together thousands of scientists to build the world’s first atomic bomb
- ‘Entire system working to protect Brij Bhushan’: Vinesh Phogat says wrestlers to continue fight
- Mark Zuckerberg lays off 8,000 employees, spends $130B on AI
- Who is Jacob Tsimerman: Fields Medal-winning mathematics professor who was once one of AI’s biggest critics, now joining OpenAI to tackle AI safety
- Only three Hawaiian producers meet US’s organic honey standards; study suggests rule review