The bench rejected a submission made by the state’s additional advocate-general, P V Balasubramaniam, that withdrawing paid VIP darshan would cause revenue loss to the temples. The bench rejected a submission made by the state’s additional advocate-general, P V Balasubramaniam, that withdrawing paid VIP darshan would cause revenue loss to the temples.
Trending
- Defence secy Rajesh Kumar Singh gets addl charge of DRDO chairman as Samir Kamat retires
- Arms, IED smuggling network under scanner as NIA conducts raids across four states
- Shubman Gill and Sai Sudharsan script T20 history, become first-ever pair to …
- ‘I have given him 3 dates’: DK Shivakumar’s astrologer predicts long stint for him as Karnataka chief minister
- A Note of Discord: US divided on proposed Trump $250 bill
- Suspense over Vinesh Phogat’s weight category ahead of Asian Games trials
- Social Security payment change will affect 3.6 million beneficiaries: What Direct Express users need to know
- Sooryavanshi equals Maxwell’s 12-year-old IPL record with stunning 96-run blitz