The Delhi High Court examined the impugned order and the reasons furnished by the petitioner and found no merit in the challenge. The Court specifically rejected the submissions that the petitioner’s lack of awareness of tax laws or his alleged illiteracy could justify the delay. It held that such a plea was not tenable in law. The Delhi High Court examined the impugned order and the reasons furnished by the petitioner and found no merit in the challenge. The Court specifically rejected the submissions that the petitioner’s lack of awareness of tax laws or his alleged illiteracy could justify the delay. It held that such a plea was not tenable in law.
Trending
- ‘Very serious’: UN watchdog flags sharp rise in North Korea’s nuclear activity
- Trade talks: Indian team to visit US from April 20; move follows PM Modi-Trump call
- Z security, ED raids row: AAP-Raghav Chadha faceoff turns ugly; BJP piles on
- Give befitting reply to Delhi’s zamindars: Mamata in her Bengali new year message
- ‘Misrule, chaos, corruption’: PM Modi targets Mamata-led TMC govt in ‘Poila Boishakh’ message
- Stalin vs Centre: Why is Tamil Nadu protesting the delimitation bill
- Did China secretly help Iran track US bases? The ‘spy satellite’ in question
- Did China secretly help Iran track US bases? The ‘spy satellite’ in question