Candace Owens has reignited debate over the killing of Charlie Kirk after reports claimed the bullet recovered from his body did not match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. She criticized those who supported the case against Robinson, calling the evidence “non existent.” While investigators cite alleged confessions, the new forensic detail has raised fresh questions and intensified public scrutiny around the trial. Candace Owens has reignited debate over the killing of Charlie Kirk after reports claimed the bullet recovered from his body did not match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. She criticized those who supported the case against Robinson, calling the evidence “non existent.” While investigators cite alleged confessions, the new forensic detail has raised fresh questions and intensified public scrutiny around the trial.
Trending
- As polls show him slipping, Brazil’s Lula names VP as running mate
- ‘I know. There’s nothing I can do about it’: Kristi Noem’s husband to online models on wife’s alleged affair
- ‘Beginning of brutality akin to Manipur’: Opposition slams BJP, JDU after woman molested in Bihar
- Aw Crap! Trump’s image goes down the toilet
- Wd, no-ball, wd: Arshdeep joins unwanted list with 11-ball over in IPL vs GT
- BBC sacks Scott Mills: What led to sudden fall of Radio 2 breakfast star? All FAQs answered
- Tiger Woods’ alleged insult to Vanessa Trump after DUI sparks fallout
- IMD warns of more heatwave days in many states, April to get above normal rainfall in the country, brining down temp in certain parts